Skip to content

Open Source Remote Config

If you are looking for open source remote config, you are usually trying to solve more than one problem at once. Typical goals include:

  • change application behavior without redeploying
  • keep control of your own infrastructure
  • avoid platform lock-in
  • use one system for both runtime config and feature flags
  • support web, mobile, and backend applications

Nona is built for that combination.

Why teams look for open source remote config

Section titled “Why teams look for open source remote config”

Common reasons are wanting a self-hosted deployment model, source visibility and control, less vendor coupling, backend-friendly remote config instead of only mobile SDK flows, and feature flags in the same product.

Nona gives you:

  • open source runtime config
  • self-hosted deployment
  • Docker-first setup
  • plain HTTP access
  • official JavaScript and .NET clients
  • projects and environments
  • typed config entries
  • scopes for client and server reads
  • history and rollback

The fastest real test is:

  1. run the Docker image
  2. create one text or number setting
  3. create one API key
  4. read the value over HTTP

For example:

Terminal window
nona entries set \
--project storefront \
--environment production \
--key App:BannerText \
--value "Free shipping this week" \
--scope client \
--content-type text

Nona is not only a remote config system.

It also supports feature flags through the same model:

  • boolean entries for flags
  • text, number, and json for broader runtime config
  • the same project/environment/scope/key model for both

That is useful when a team wants one operational surface instead of separate tools for flags and configuration.

Nona is strongest when you want open source remote config, self-hosted feature flags, plain HTTP access from any language, server-side remote config as well as frontend/mobile reads, and a migration path away from Firebase Remote Config.

Good first Nona remote-config values:

  • App:BannerText
  • App:MinimumSupportedVersion
  • Limits:MaxItems
  • App:Settings

No.

Nona supports remote config and feature flags in the same system, which is useful when teams want one operational surface instead of separate tools.

Yes.

That is one of the important differences in how it is positioned. Nona works for web, mobile, and backend applications instead of only mobile-SDK-centric flows.

No.

You can use plain HTTP directly, or use the official JavaScript and .NET clients if you prefer.

When is Nona a strong fit for open source remote config?

Section titled “When is Nona a strong fit for open source remote config?”

Nona is a strong fit when you want open source remote config, self-hosting, plain HTTP access, and feature flags in the same product.